Gabia Paskauskas vs Amelie Smejkalova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Paskauskas vs A. Smejkalova

Gabia Paskauskas
GBR
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
20
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
852
0
Best Rank
773
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Amelie Smejkalova
CZE
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
20
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
852
0
Best Rank
773
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Paskauskas 1 - 0 Smejkalova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gabia Paskauskas winning 2 and Amelie Smejkalova winning 1. The last match between Gabia Paskauskas and Amelie Smejkalova was at the W15 Clemson, 14-11-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-5 7-6(7).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paskauskas | 1 |
| Smejkalova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Clemson(11-14-24)
Gabia Paskauskas
3
7
7
Amelie Smejkalova
6
5
6
G. Paskauskas vs A. Smejkalova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.00% (12-12) | Career Total W/L | 49.28% (34-35) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Paskauskas vs A. Smejkalova Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gabia Paskauskas has won 35.54% of points on their second serve, while Amelie Smejkalova has won 39.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gabia Paskauskas, in recent form, has won 52.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Amelie Smejkalova has won 57.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.15% and 38.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gabia Paskauskas has saved 49.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Amelie Smejkalova has saved 43.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gabia Paskauskas has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 8/4), with Amelie Smejkalova winning 60.00% (W/L 3/2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gabia Paskauskas has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/8), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Amelie Smejkalova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 16/12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Gabia Paskauskas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 8/3), where as Amelie Smejkalova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.00% of matches (W/L 3/2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gabia Paskauskas winning 1 times and Amelie Smejkalova being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gabia Paskauskas winning 2 and Amelie Smejkalova winning 1.
- The last match between Gabia Paskauskas and Amelie Smejkalova was at the W15 Clemson, 14-11-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-5 7-6(7).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:17:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gabia Paskauskas has played against opponents with an average rank of 157.08 while Amelie Smejkalova has played against players with an average rank of 175.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gabia Paskauskas has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Amelie Smejkalova has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gabia Paskauskas has converted 47.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Amelie Smejkalova has converted 37.50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Gabia Paskauskas vs Amelie Smejkalova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Paskauskas vs A. Smejkalova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 17 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 3:17:0 | Average Match Time | 3:17:0 |
| 66% (92/139) | 1st Serve % | 61% (63/104) |
| 59% (54/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (37/63) |
| 43% (20/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (8/26) |
| 43% (45/104) | Return Points Win % | 47% (65/139) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Paskauskas 39%, Smejkalova 39%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Paskauskas 56%, Smejkalova 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Paskauskas 34%, Smejkalova 44%.
G. Paskauskas Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-0 4-6 10-7 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
A. Smejkalova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(2) 5-7 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||

G. Paskauskas vs A. Smejkalova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (12/12) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.28% (34/35) |
| 48.21% (27/29) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.32% (79/78) |
| 49.81% (262/264) | Games Win/Loss | 50.10% (723/720) |
| 57.89% (11/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (16/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.43% (18/17) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 22 | Aces Total | 54 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 93 | Total Double Faults | 180 |
| 1:29:1 | Average Match Time | 1:26:36 |
| 294.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 366.54 |
| 61% (733/1201) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2193/3701) |
| 55% (400/733) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1268/2193) |
| 40% (185/468) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (692/1508) |
| 44% (64/144) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (221/463) |
| 44% (501/1126) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1660/3637) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Challenger W/L | 36.00% (9/16) |
| 68.75% (11/5) | Futures W/L | 59.52% (25/17) |
| 50% (12/24) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (34/69) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 63% (5/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 89% (9/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (39/31) |
| 11% (9/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (39/8) |
| 27% (15/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (30/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction07:40 AM 16/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction08:05 AM 16/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-10
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal